Is proctoring in robotic surgery truly helpful? Evaluating general surgeons’ perspectives
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Issue Date
2026-12-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Springer NatureJournal
Journal of Robotic SurgeryDOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03043-4Abstract
Proctoring is a well-established teaching method in minimally invasive surgery, shown to enhance surgical safety and reduce operative time while facilitating faster skill acquisition. With the growing adoption of robotic platforms across multiple specialties, and the increasing interest among surgeons in integrating robotics into their practice, proctoring has re-emerged as an important training technique. While its benefits in laparoscopy are well documented, evidence regarding its role in robotic surgery-particularly from surgeons’ perspectives-remains limited. We conducted an online survey among general surgeons who had received proctoring sessions during their surgical careers. The aim was to assess their perceptions of proctoring in robotic surgery, focusing on its impact on their learning process, operative times, and integration into daily practice. Respondents were also invited to provide qualitative feedback on specific benefits of proctoring and areas for improvement. Of the 97 proctored surgeons invited to participate, 32 (33%) completed the survey. The majority were male, with a median of 15 years of professional experience. Most surgeons reported receiving proctoring for 2–4 cases, with credentialing cited as the most common reason. A statistically significant association was observed between the number of proctored cases and the perceived reduction in the learning curve (p = 0.0019). Surgeons also reported greater confidence in managing complex cases after proctoring (p = 0.0051) and increased adoption of robotics in their daily practice (p = 0.015). Proctoring appears to be a valuable educational tool for general surgeons incorporating robotic surgery. It helps shorten the learning curve, builds confidence in managing complex cases, and supports the integration of robotics into routine practice. In addition, proctoring connects trainees with experienced surgeons, enabling personalized guidance and meaningful knowledge exchange. Constructive feedback between proctor and trainee is essential to maximize the effectiveness of this training approach.Type
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Rights
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_16ecLanguage
engISSN
18632483EISSN
18632491ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-03043-4
Scopus Count
Collections
